Lacking all reason

My previous post featured what I thought was a good article on the positive side of mixing discussion, consent and sex. Today’s post brings you the flipside – a really stupid post on sex and consent. Other bloggers may aim to bring you only good things; I like to go with more of a harmonious yin and yang approach.

The article is (ironically) from Reason magazine and is entitled ‘California’s Sexual Consent Law Will Ruin Good Sex for Women‘. It was prompted by the recent ‘Yes means Yes‘ law passed in California, which aims to shift the emphasis in colleges from an assumption of consent to a need to actively gain consent. There’s an interesting discussion to be had about that law, but the Reason article by Shikha Dalmia certainly isn’t it. The bit that really irked me was this…

…there is usually a difference in tempo between men and women, with women generally requiring more “convincing.” And someone who requires convincing is not yet in a position to offer “affirmative” much less “enthusiastic” consent. That doesn’t mean that the final experience is unsatisfying — but it does mean that initially one has to be coaxed out of one’s comfort zone. Affirmative consent would criminalize that.
The reality is that much of sex is not consensual — but it is also not non-consensual. It resides in a gray area in between, where sexual experimentation and discovery happen.

I’m going to resist the temptation to draw conclusions about Shikha Dalmia’s sex life based on this. I can say it’s pretty piss poor logic with no apparent understanding of what consent means.

One of the great things that exploring kink has done for me is helped me to discuss and negotiate sexual activity. If you grow up watching sex in movies (both mainstream and porn) you get the impression that great sex just happens automatically. One minute the cynical private eye is trading witty barbs and smouldering looks with his femme fatale client, the next minute, just after she’s tried to slap him, they’re having amazing sex without so much as a yes, no or maybe. In reality experimentation, and the discussion that must go along with it, makes everything better. I’ve never yet had a mutual fantasy ruined by talking about it. I’ve had plenty of experiences where misunderstanding and a lack of communication definitely made things worse.

Gagged and Bound

Hopefully the gentleman in this image got all his discussion out of the way up front, as his current options look decidedly limited. The image is of course from Divine Bitches.

Author: paltego

See the 'about' page if you really want to know about me.

2 thoughts on “Lacking all reason”

  1. As a male in his 40’s that tends to over communicate, I agree with you. However this law is for teenagers and young adults (still kids) that are enrolled in college.

    As a young man I would have been horrified to have had to ask for consent. Consent back in my day was seeing how far you could go while making out. I have always honored a woman saying “no”, but don’t always ask or hear an affirmative “yes”.

    Regarding your quote above “I’ve had plenty of experiences where misunderstanding and a lack of communication definitely made things worse.” You had the opportunity to learn from those experiences and correct them. Kids today will have to learn through the legal system.

    1. I’m in two minds about the law. I do get your point of view. Inevitably there will be some messy court cases arising out of this. Kids are not the best about making decisions and are particularly bad when sex is involved.

      However, it’s not like the law operates in an entirely abstract and autonomous way. It still requires somebody to come forward, talk to the authorities and accuse someone else of assaulting them. That’s not a thing to be undertaken lightly. Every make out session isn’t suddenly going to be raided by the authorities. This just shifts the balance when cases do come up. Given the huge number of sexual assaults on college campuses I’m not sure that’s a bad thing.

      I also think that the idea of being horrified at the idea of having to ask for consent is a function of the surrounding culture. It seems horrifying because it would have been weird and unexpected at that time. If it becomes the standard expected thing, then maybe it’d be horrifying not to ask? When I look back at sexual culture over the last 50 or so years, it’s changed enormously, in many ways for the better. The average teenager in the 50’s would have been horrified at the thought of anal sex, but that’s no longer true. Culture changes what’s normal, and I think making it normal to have more discussion about consent would be a good change.

      -paltego

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *