If there’s ever an attempt to assign kinks to places, findomme would be a shoe in (ahem) for Beverly Hills. There’s money, high fashion and an endless number of elegant, well dressed women shoppers whose natural resting expression is disdainful. At least, that was my observations from a day’s shopping there. Even the assistants at the boutiques tend to a bratty ‘Are you sure you’re in the right place … Sir’ attitude. It’s fun.
It made me wonder what the correlation is between findomme fans and wealth. I’m confident if you plotted interest in things like bondage or foot worship against wealth there would not be a high correlation. The idea that male submissives skew to powerful successful types is a stupid cliche that always bugs me. However, if someone has linked money to kink, that does suggest some sort of correlation. Is that often down to a wealthy background? Or is it the opposite? A lack of money causing it to become a totemic artifact? Are there more or less than the average number of findomme fans around areas like Beverly Hills? It’s not a kink I’ve ever been attracted to, so I lack an intuition for it.
This image is from a 1987 fashion shoot of Cindy Crawford and Paulina Porizkova by Richard Avedon.

Oddly enough, the last time I featured the Meta Gala – back in 2018 – that also involved Zendaya. Her
You can see the original full size image
Unfortunately I don’t have a source for this. Guessing it’s a mainstream fashion shot that I stumbled on via a femdom tumblr.
This is Mischa Barton shot for
This is Uma Thurman with Marcus Schenkenberg, as shot by
This is Cindy Crawford shot by Ellen Von Unwerth for Italian Vogue in 1991. Which of the above theories matches to this particular image? I think I could make a case that it works for all of them.
Although